The Latest Transgender News

Category: Topic Reviews

A collection of links to essential transgender reading

Amnesty reveals the true nature of anti-rights gender criticals. J.K. Rowling goes ballistic.

Amnesty International recently published a report on what they call the “anti-rights movement” in the UK, which also includes gender critical activism. It did not take long before the gender critical TERFs – which normally think of themselves as defenders of free speech – forced Amnesty to take the report down. Amnesty is now reviewing the report.

By Jack Molay

A Growing Threat: the Anti-Rights Movement in the UK mapped 117 organisations, including anti-abortion groups, organizations promoting conversion practices, branches of US Christian-right organizations and 51 groups described as “gender critical.”

This is not the first time Amnesty has argued that the campaign against transgender rights  is an increasingly organized political movement using litigation, lobbying, media influence and institutional networks to restrict legal gender recognition, healthcare and trans people’s participation in public life.

Amnesty has also pointed out that anti-trans activism has affected media coverage of trans lives. Amnesty’s more detailed May briefing found that four British newspapers published almost 17,000 articles concerning trans people in just over five years, around nine every day, while trans voices were almost absent.

The new report made some observations that everyone who has been following the current anti-trans hysteria will recognize:

TERFs are part of a larger anti-human rights system

The gender critical movement is part of a larger system of anti-rights organizations, that target women, immigrants, LGBTQ-people, people of color and more. Amnesty put it this way:

“These organisations form part of a wider anti-rights ecosystem—a network of groups that work on different issues but share similar goals and often support each other’s efforts to roll back human rights protections.”

J.K. Rowling and the “trans-exclusionary radical feminists” (TERFs) are unsurprisingly uncomfortable with being grouped with fascists and religious extremist, even though they as far as trans people go share the same opinions and use the same talking points.

(Amnesty does not use the tern TERF, and refer instead to “gender critical” organizations.)

The effects on other groups

Another point that is bound to make any TERF angry is Amnesty pointing out that they by targeting fundamental human rights principles, also undermines the protection of cis people.

Yes, the following paragraph is primarily addressing religious fanatics and the extreme right, but the main argument holds true: When you violate fundamental human rights principles when addressing one marginalized group, that will make it more likely that others will use the same tactics against other groups.

“Some of these groups describe themselves as ‘anti-gender’ because they visibly oppose the rights and equality of women and LGBT+ people. However, by targeting women and LGBT+ people, they also challenge a fundamental human rights principle: that human rights belong to everyone equally. Human rights are interconnected and mutually reinforcing. When the rights of one group are restricted, protections for others can also be weakened, even where the effects are not immediately visible.”

The origins of “gender ideology”

In the report Amnesty also argues that nearly anti-rights groups, TERFs included, use the term “gender ideology” to present some undefined and false idea of a conspiracy of fanatics trying to upend the natural order of society and nature.

“Anti-rights actors seek a society in which women and men have fixed and distinct roles, based on what they view as ‘natural’ and ‘traditional’. These actors perceive the idea that gender is socially constructed as a threat because it suggests that gender roles can, and do, change across societies and over time.

“In fact, progress in the rights of women and LGBT+ people has been underpinned by changing understandings of gender and social roles.
Anti-rights actors refer to this perceived threat as ‘gender ideology’, portraying it as an attack on national traditions, family structures, marriage and religious freedom. These narratives often seek to generate fear and uncertainty and rely on misinformation or exaggerated claims.”

Let me add here that all the reactionary groups Amnesty cover make use of the concept of “biological sex” to stop any discussion of what is clearly true: That for some people the gender assigned at birth does not match their deep experienced identity. The anti-trans activists are suppressing this scientifically documented truth by insisting that gender and “biological sex” are the same.

The irony is that the groups that talk about a monolithic gender ideology conspiracy, are themselves part of a such a conspiracy. That is a conspiracy where a large group of organizations and activists present the same simplistic and misleading narratives about both sex and gender in order to defend their irrational hatred of trans people.

The Gender Critical category is the largest

Of all the hate groups identified (my term, not Amnesty’s) the gender critical group is the largest.

Note that this figure in itself is extremely dangerous for the TERFs. It gives people a clear picture of the fact that gender critical activism is part of a larger system of oppression, hate and persecution.

J.K. Rowling’s reaction to all of this is predictable. She presents herself and her transphobic allies as victim of Amnesty’s oppression. Amnesty, according to her, believes that some people do not deserve rights, as women, girls and those who are same-sex attracted.

This is classical psychological projection: Accuse your opponent for being like yourself. This is, of course, completely unbelievable. Amnesty has an impeccable reputation as regards the rights of women and LGBTQ people. And this very report was written in defense of women and queer people.

Rowling is now going to financially support the organizations listed by Amnesty.

Note that the report was written and published by the UK branch of Amnesty International. The international organization was apparently not involved in the production of the report.

The organizations listed

The report also included a list of the anti-rights organizations mapped by Amnesty. The TERFs need to stop this list from becoming public knowledge, because having a renowned human rights organization add you to a list with conversion therapy supporters, anti-abortionists, fascists and religious fanatics undermines the idea that you are a democratic defender of defenseless women and children.

Amnesty UK did probably make a mistake here, as they did not explain why the various organizations meet the “anti-rights” definition. An appendix with that information would have saved them from a lot of legal problems.

The inclusion of Beira’s Place, Rowling’s cis women-only support service for sexual-violence survivors, makes sense, but it allowed opponents to claim that Amnesty has “blacklisted” a rape-crisis service. They can now use this to redirect the discussion from the oppression of trans people to the oppression of a white, upper class, reactionary hater with a fortune of 1.2 billion US dollars.

I am afraid that fighting evil is a complex play of chess where you have to think at least five moves ahead and understand that your opponent may change the rules at any time.

Here are the gender critical organizations and networks listed in the report.

Seen Network (Sex Equality and Equity Network Limited)
Seen in the City
SEEN in HR
Parli SEEN
SEEN in STEM
SEEN in Journalism
SEEN in Schools
SEEN in Sport
SEEN in Health
SEEN in Retail
Local Authority SEEN
TU SEEN
SEEN in Publishing
Third Sector SEEN
Police SEEN UK
SEEN on Campus
FiLiA
Bayswater support group
Children of Transitioners
Get the L Out UK
Gender Critical Greens
Labour Women’s Declaration
Legal Feminist
Lesbian Strength
Merched Cymru
OBJECT – Women Not Sex Objects!
Older Feminist Network
Protect & Teach
Safe Schools Alliance UK (SSAUK)
Trans Widows Voices
Virago Women’s Workshop
LGB Alliance Cymru
Beira’s Place
Conservatives for Women
Fair Play for Women
For Women Scotland
Gay Men’s Network UK
Keep Prisons Single Sex
Let Women Speak (formerly Standing for Women)
LGB Alliance
The Lesbian Project
Transgender Trend
Woman’s Place UK (WPUK)
Women’s Declaration International (WDI)
Sex Matters
Murray Blackburn and Mackenzie Women’s Rights Network (WRN) LGB Christians
Liberal Voice for Women
ScotPAG Scottish Professionals Advising on Gender

See also:
BBC: Amnesty ‘regret’ over criticism of JK Rowling’s sexual violence support centre
Newsweek: Amnesty International’s Clash With JK Rowling Charity Explained
LGBTQ Nation: JK Rowling encourages anti-trans groups to sue human rights org for labeling them “anti-rights”
Erin Reed: TERF Activist J.K. Rowling Threatens To Finance Wave Of Attacks On Amnesty International Over Report On Anti-Trans Groups

On the US Department of Health and Human Services’ Report on Transgender Health Care (Topic Review)

The Trump administration’s Department of Health and Human Services, led by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has released an updated 400-page report on pediatric gender dysphoria that claims gender-affirming care for trans youth is harmful and insufficiently evidenced.

It is being promoted by HHS as a landmark, “peer-reviewed” document. But within hours of publication, major medical organizations, researchers, and LGBTQ advocates were describing it in very different terms: pseudoscience and politics dressed up as science.

More here.

On this page, we will link to relevant online sources who are covering the report.

RFK, Jr., Releases Report Attacking Medical Care for Trans Children

Physicians for Reproductive Health: “Today, the Department of Health and Human Services released a new “report” touted by known anti-trans clinicians and researchers known for historically supporting an anti-trans agenda.”

In New Report, HHS Ignores the Facts & Again Looks to Hand Power to Political Hacks, Not Parents or Doctors

HHS names authors and releases peer review comments for gender dysphoria report

AMA and AAP: “We reject characterizations of our approach to gender-affirming care as negligent or ideologically driven, and take particular issue with the false assertion that our members have committed ‘malpractice’… “

HHS Names Authors of Its Gender Dysphoria Report

RFK Jr. Calls It “the Most Comprehensive Study to Date” on Gender-Affirming Care. Half its Authors Aren’t Even Doctors.

HHS finalizes report on gender-affirming care for youth, medical groups push back

Trump’s Anti-Trans Report Authors Revealed: Hate Groups and Billionaire-Funded Anti-Trans Activists

HHS Report on Trans Youth Care Faces Broad Criticism

HHS: Gender Dysphoria Report

On the US HHS report on healthcare for transgender children and adolescents (resources)

The Trump administration’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has released a report on transgender healthcare, which has been widely criticized for its lack of scientific rigor and reliance on pseudoscience.

The report, commissioned under Trump’s executive order, promotes conversion therapy for transgender youth and redefines social transition as medical treatment. It also suggests that transgender healthcare should be judged based on employment status and romantic relationships rather than patient well-being.

Medical experts, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, have condemned the report as misleading and inaccurate. It ignores established research showing the benefits of gender-affirming care and instead pushes an ideological agenda. The report also falsely claims that European countries are pulling back on transgender healthcare, despite recent medical guidelines in France, Germany, Austria, and Switzerland supporting gender-affirming care.

Here we have collected some articles analyzing the report and its consequences.

Trump’s HHS urges therapy for transgender youth, departing from broader gender-affirming health care (PBS)

Gender transition care for #trans children and teens lacks evidence of benefits and poses risks, according to a new report released by Trump. Medical experts describes it as poor quality research that threatens access to care. (Washington Post)
Archive

Fact Check: Trump’s HHS Review On Trans Care Filled With Pseudoscience, Pushes Conversion Therapy (Erin in the Morning)

RFK Jr.’s HHS releases controversial report on gender-affirming care. Here’s what it says. (USA Today)

Dr. Susan J. Kressly, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, said in a statement that “this report misrepresents the current medical consensus and fails to reflect the realities of pediatric care.”

RFK Jr.’s HHS report pushes therapy, not medical interventions, for trans youth (Washington Blade)

Inside the HHS Review on Trans Youth: Facts, Fears, Fallout (Transvitae)

New HHS Report Urges ‘Exploratory Therapy’ for Transgender Youth (Time)

“Though the report argues that this “exploratory therapy” is not the same as the long practice of “conversion therapy”—which is a practice of attempting to change someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity—advocates see little difference.”

Time

Administration condemns gender-affirming care for youth in report that finds “sparse” evidence of harm (19th)

What does the HHS gender-affirming care report mean for trans rights? (Transitics)

Trump HHS tiptoes around endorsing conversion therapy for transgender minors (Healthcare Dive)

Trump administration releases 400-page review of gender dysphoria treatment for youths but won’t say who wrote it (CNN)

“Gender dysphoria is a term that mental health professionals use to describe clinically significant distress someone feels because their sense of their gender does not match the sex they were assigned at birth. It is an official diagnosis in the DSM, a book published by the American Psychiatric Association that classifies mental disorders, but not everyone who identifies as transgender or gender-diverse has this diagnosis.

Gender-affirming care is a wide range of treatments offered by a multidisciplinary team that is tailored to the individual.

For years, major mainstream medical associations – including the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the Endocrine Society, the American Psychological Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry – have affirmed the practice of gender-affirming care and agree that it’s clinically appropriate care that can provide lifesaving treatment for children and adults.”

CNN

Trump administration HHS gender dysphoria report (Wikipedia)

HHS Releases Comprehensive Review of Medical Interventions for Children and Adolescents with Gender Dysphoria (HHS)

Researchers slam HHS report on gender-affirming care for youth (Science)

What professional organizations say about gender affirming care and the report

Experts from the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Psychological Association, Fenway Health, Yale, and many other organizations have condemned Trump’s report as pseudoscience.

The American Medical Association supports everyone’s access to quality evidence-based health care regardless of gender or sexual orientation

American Psychiatric Organization

Endocrine Society

American Psychological Association: APA adopts groundbreaking policy supporting transgender, gender diverse, nonbinary individuals

APA Statement on Access to Treatment for Transgender, Gender Diverse, and Nonbinary People

American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Statement on HHS Report Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria

AACAP Statement Responding to Efforts to ban Evidence-Based Care for Transgender and Gender Diverse Youth

The World Professional Association for Transgender Health
(WPATH) and the US Professional Association for Transgender Health (USPATH) are deeply concerned about the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) report

LGBTQ organizations respond

Lambda Legal Responds to Trump’s HHS Report: A Biased Effort to Eradicate Medical Care for Children and Youth

GLAAD

The Trans Journalists Association urges caution in covering the HHS report on gender care

Image: Getty

All you need to know about the “autogynephilia” theory (Resources)

Ray Blanchard’s “autogynephilia” theory states that lesbian trans women are men who are sexually attracted to their own inner female. The hypothesis is used actively by transphobes to invalidate trans women as “paraphiliacs” or sexual perverts. The fact is, however, that the theory has been thoroughly debunked by both trans people and science.

On this page, we give you a selection of articles and papers that give you the history of Blanchard’s model of “transsexuality”, documentation on why it is misleading, information on how it hurts trans women and how it is used by transphobes today.

We also presents links to articles that covers J. Michael Bailey’s book on the topic: The Man who would be Queen.

We hope this resource page may be of help to trans and nonbinary people who reach for this theory when trying to explain their own sexuality and gender variance. The theory is based on 19th century concepts of sexuality and gender, so it feeds easily into internalized transphobia and homophobia among those who have been raised in a traditionalist culture.

Some highlights (documentation below):

  • Trans people, like cis people, are sexual beings with sexual fantasies, and for some trans people, especially those who have not transitioned, dreams about becoming their target sex may be eroticized. Such transformations open up for scenarios where they can have a sex life in harmony with their true selves.
  • Such fantasies are not limited to lesbian trans women. Many straight trans women and trans men have them too. Such fantasies have also been found among people who consider themselves cis.
  • The idea that there are two completely separate categories of trans women have been debunked by science.
  • Feeling sexy is not a sexual perversion, neither among cis people nor among trans people.
  • Lesbian trans women are perfectly capable of being attracted to other women.
  • Ray Blanchard, the man who came up with the autogynephilia hypothesis has never published any proof of his theory. Indeed, his own data debunks that there are two completely distinct categories of trans women. He is now actively helping “gender critical” transphobic “feminists” and white supremacists in their attacks on trans women.

From our network

All you need to know about “autogynephilia”

Autogynephilia defined

Trans woman: Am I a woman or is it just “autogynephilia”?

Continue reading

The Transphobic Olympic Travesty, the Imane Khelif Story (Resources)

Imane Khelif is a cis (non-transgender) woman who is very good at boxing . In spite of all this she has become the target of a viscous transphopic attacks where people like JK Rowling tells the world she is a man beating up cis women under the Paris Olympics .

We have gathered a collection of articles and opinion pieces for you that throws light upon what is really going in here.

The takeaway is:

  • Imane Khelif is a cis woman, not a man.
  • The attacks against her reflects toxic transphobic attitudes.
  • The implicit goal of these attacks is to force all women to follow narrowly defined sexist ideas about what a proper woman should be and to uphold a clear divide between the two traditional genders.
  • This transphobia is mixed up with a racism that implies that strong Black women are a threat to white women and that they must therefore be classified as men.

“Over time, people have looked at genitalia, they’ve looked at chromosomes, they look for a specific gene, they’ve looked at testosterone. And what we end up with is the understanding that there’s really no clear cut definition of sex, because each of these iterations of testing has kind of collapsed under its own weight,” says Jaime Schultz, a professor with Penn State University’s department of kinesiology.

That is the problem, isn’t it? In order to police the gendered behavior, presentation and self understanding of men and women, the fundamentalists cannot live with a world where gender and gender presentation are ambiguous.

The Imane Khelif Story, Selected Articles and Videos

Olympic boxer Hergie Bacyadan has explained why his trans identity is valid despite his decision not to take hormones.

Continue reading

What do we know about transgender regret? Here are the facts.

Anti-transgender activists are making a lot of noise about trans people regretting transitioning and detransition rates. The fact is that only a tiny minority of trans people who have transitioned regret their decision, and most of those who do express regret do so because of social harassment.

Indeed, evidence suggests that less than 1% of transgender people who undergo gender-affirming surgery report regret. Keep in mind that 14.4% of the broader regret similar surgeries.

A meta-study of existing research gave the following summary back in 2021:

We have collected some must read resources documenting what we know about regret rates. The links are gathered from our Essential Transgender Reading Flipboard Magazine.

Not all who transition do get gender-affirming surgeries, so keep that in mind when you look at the following articles and papers. The numbers are not always directly comparable.

Transgender regret is very rare, indeed

More people regret having children than having gender-affirming care, study finds.

Landmark Systematic Review Of Trans Surgery: Regret Rate “Remarkably Low”.

A thematic analysis of disinformation in gender-affirming healthcare bans in the United States.

Continue reading

Critical discussions about the NHS Cass Review and its effect on transgender youth

The Cass Review is an independent report commissioned by NHS England in 2020 to examine gender identity services for children and young people in England. The review was led by Dr. Hilary Cass, a retired consultant paediatrician with no insight into transgender lives.

We have gathered some articles and comments that make sense of the report and the political context.

Cass Review contains ‘serious flaws’, according to Yale Law School

Working group of trans experts – including clinicians – finds Cass Report ‘deeply flawed’

Biological and psychosocial evidence in the Cass Review: a critical commentary

Over 130 Irish academics sign open letter criticising Cass Review on transgender healthcare

Dr. Hillary Cass, author of the Cass Review gave an interview with NPR in which she says that transition effectiveness should be measured by “employment” and “getting out of the house.”

Dr Hilary Cass says a trans conversion therapy ban could ‘frighten off’ therapists

Dr. Cass Backpedals From Review: HRT, Blockers Should Be Made Available

Anti-trans media figures have latched onto a flawed report out of Britain in order to push for broad restrictions and, in at least one instance, suggest that violence against the parents of trans children is justified.

The Cass Review, WPATH Files, and the Perpetual Debate over Gender-Affirming Care

Do no harm? The trouble with Cass’ therapy recommendations

England’s Anti-Trans Cass Review Is Politics Disguised As Science

The Cass review into NHS England’s gender identity services for children and young people lacks rigour but fits the government’s agenda

The Cass Review: Cis-supremacy in the UK’s approach to healthcare for trans children

“We believe the Cass Report is a deliberate part of a political project aiming to reduce the availability of trans healthcare, possibly eventually in its entirety. “

Dr Hilary Cass ignored whistleblowers warnings about increase in waiting list deaths.

“Through its cisheteronormative agenda, the Cass Review is enacting the prejudice that trans people suffer in the United Kingdom”

British Medical Association Calls Cass Review “Unsubstantiated,” Passes Resolution Against Implementation

No trans regrets: What the Cass report gets wrong

Hilary Cass has been given peerage from the cross-bench honours list

Scientific American: The U.K.’s Cass Review Badly Fails Trans Children

Colleagues Allege Cass Recommended Book Comparing Transition To The Holocaust

The Cass Report: The Good, The Bad, The Critical

Dr Hilary Cass denies claim that she recommended ‘gender-critical’ book to colleagues

The Strange Report Fueling the War on Trans Kids
Archived

The Cass Review Into Gender Identity Services for Children 

With puberty blockers now banned in much of the UK, those hoping for gender treatment say they have been forced into difficult decisions

    These links have been taken from out Flipboard Magazine for Essential Transgender News.

    © 2026 Transgender Report

    Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑